HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5539 of 2026 Court No. - 88 HON'BLE SANJIV KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri A.C. Srivastava, learned Counsel for the revisionist, Sri Satish Kumar Mishra, learned Counsel for the opposite party No.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This criminal revision has been filed against the judgement and order dated 15.07.2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/FTC-II, Gautam Budh Nagar in Criminal Appeal No.146 of 2023 (Veer Singh vs. State of U.P. and Another) as well as judgement and order dated 16.10.2023 passed by the Additional Court No.2, Gautam Budha Nagar in Complaint Case No.5913 of 2022 (Seema vs. Veer Singh). 3. The learned Trial Court convicted the revisionist for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and sentenced him to undergo six months’ simple imprisonment. A fine of Rs. 10 lakhs was also imposed upon him. In default of payment of the fine, he was further directed to undergo imprisonment for three months. It was further directed that, out of the total amount of fine, Rs. 9 lakhs be disbursed to the complainant as compensation under Section 357(1) Cr.P.C. The revisionist filed an appeal against the aforesaid judgment and order of the Trial Court, which was dismissed on 15.07.2026. 4. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the revisionist that the offence was compoundable at any stage of the proceedings. After the decision of the appeal, both parties entered into a compromise and Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Satish Kumar Mishra, G.A. Veer Singh .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) appeared before the learned Trial Court, which endorsed the said compromise by passing the order dated 27.07.2026. A copy of the said order has been placed on record by way of supplementary affidavit, which shows that, in terms of the compromise, the convict paid a sum of Rs.5 lakhs to opposite party No.2/complainant, which she received, and her statement in this regard was also recorded. It is, therefore, submitted that since both parties have settled their dispute by entering into a compromise, the orders passed by the learned Trial Court as well as the learned Appellate Court be set aside in terms of the compromise. 5. Learned Counsel for opposite party No.2 has admitted that both the parties have entered into compromise and opposite party No.2/complainant has received the amount. She now has no grievance against the revisionist and has no objection if the judgments and orders of the learned Trial Court as well as the Appellate Court are set aside. 6. In view of the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the compromise entered into between the revisionist and opposite party No. 2, the present revision is allowed. The impugned judgments and orders passed by the Trial Court and the Appellate Court are hereby set aside. Consequently, the conviction of the revisionist under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is also set aside, and the revisionist is acquitted of the said offence. 7. Let a copy of this order be sent to the Trial Court concerned for necessary compliance. September 23, 2026 Amit CRLR No. 5539 of 2026 2 (Sanjiv Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad