Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9784 (ALL)

RAMSINGAR @ RAMSINGAR PATEL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/28333/2026 · 2026-09-22

Chandra Kumar Rai

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28333 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri Deena Nath Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned standing counsel for the state- respondents and Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent-gaon sabha. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the respondent no.2/Sub Divisional Officer (Judicial), Tehsil Mariahu, District Jaunpur to hear and decide the recall/restoration application dated 26.7.2024, filed by respondent no.4 (Ram Achal vs. Ramsingar) against the order dated 15.4.2024, passed in Case No.3530 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.T202214360603530) (Ramsingar vs. Gaon Sabha and Others), under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within the stipulated period." 3. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that restoration application dated 26.7.2024 filed on behalf of the private respondents for recalling the order dated 15.4.2024 is pending before respondent no.2/Sub Divisional Officer, as such, necessary direction be issued for the expeditious disposal of the pending proceeding. He further placed copy of the order-sheet of the pending proceeding, in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding expeditiously. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deena Nath Mishra, Reema Srivastava, Santosh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Ramsingar @ Ramsingar Patel .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid proceedings to its logical conclusion, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 2 months, from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before the authority concerned, considering the delay condonation matter 1st, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in accordance with law. September 23, 2026 C.Prakash WRIC No. 28333 of 2026 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad