Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9783 (AP)

KUKKA POLAIAH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/25681/2026 · 2026-09-07

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010455742026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 25681/2026 Between: 1. KUKKA POLAIAH, S/O LATE PEDDA YALLAIAH AGED 78 YEARS OCC AGRICULTURAL COOLI R/O HARIJANAWADA MERLAPAKA SRIKALAHASTI TIRUPATI DISTRICT ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 517619 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AP SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 522238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT 517503 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SRIKALAHASTRI REVENUE DIVISION TIRUPATI DISTRICT ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT 517644 4. THE TAHSILDAR, YERPEDU MANDAL TIRUPATI DISTRICT ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT 517619 5. SHRI VENKATESWARA SPONGE AND POWER PVT LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CEO M ANANDA RAO INDUSTRIAL ESTATE EXPN SRIKALAHASTRI MERLAPAKA VILLAGE YERPEDU MANDAL TIRUPATI DISTRICT ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT PINCODE 517619 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No 2 herein in not taking the facts into consideration while passing the order vide proceedings D Dis D2 e 39755 2025 dt 15 02 2026 as illegal arbitrary and violative of articles 14 16 and 21 of constitution of India and to set aside the orders vide proceedings D Dis D2 e 39755 2025 dt 15 02 2026 passed by the respondent no 2 by challenging the said order and also direct the respondent no 2 to 4 to mutate the land to an extent of Ac 1 00 Cents in Sy No 310 4L of Merlapaka Village accounts Yerpedu Mandal Tirupati District in the name of petitioner in revenue records IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased set aside the orders vide proceedings D.Dis D2/e-39755/2025 dt: 15-02-2026 passed by the respondent no.2 by challenging the said order, pending disposal of Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAYALCHERUVU ABISHEK REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is Dismissed as Withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD