[2026:RJ-JP:25556-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 1661/2025 in D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 194/2025 URN: SOSA / 3244U / 2025 “N” S/o Maharam, R/o Village - Kurka, Police Station - Uchchain, District - Bharatpur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Bharatpur (Raj.)) ----Accused-Applicant/Child in conflict with law Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Addl.G.A., Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG and Ms. Neha Goyal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 08/07/2026 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the accused-applicant along with the appeal. 2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence under Section 302 IPC. 3. Counsel for the accused-applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that accused-applicant was on bail during the course of trial. Counsel further submits that the accused-applicant has been [2026:RJ-JP:25556-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-1661/2025] falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that the accused-applicant was on bail during trial and hearing/disposal of appeal is likely to take long time. Therefore, he prayed that sentence awarded to the accused-applicant may be suspended and the accused-applicant be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 4. Learned Government Advocate cum Additional Advocate General has opposed the application for suspension of sentence and submitted that PW-1, daughter of the deceased, who is a 6 years old child, has stated in her statement recorded during trial that the accused-applicant has caused firearm injury to her mother on account of which she died. He further submitted that weapon of offence i.e. pistol has been recovered at the instance of the applicant. 5. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the statement of PW-1 as well as the report of Armourer, no case is made out to allow the application for suspension of sentence. 7. The suspension of sentence application is accordingly dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J 6/Ritu