Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22421 CRL.RP No. 1194 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1194 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
SRI.A. KUMARASWAMY S/O LATE ARUMUGAM AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS NO.14, 4TH CROSS RAMESHNAGAR MARATHAHALLI COLONY BANGALORE - 560 037 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N. SRINIVAS.,ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI. K MUNIRAJU S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.36, 2ND MAIN ROAD ADARSHA VISTHA L.N. REDDY COLONY VIGNAN NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 037 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NARAYANA MURTHY S.,ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W SECTION 401 (FILED U/S.438 R/W SEC.442 BNSS) CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO A. SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22421 CRL.RP No. 1194 of 2025
14.05.2025 PASSED BY THE HONBLE COURT OF LXXIII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU (CCH-74) IN CRL.A.NO.25197/2023 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
1. After addressing the arguments for sometime, memo came to be filed. Memo reads as under:
"The petitioner already deposited Rs.1,44,000/-. Further petitioner agreed to pay balance fine amount of Rs.2,11,000/- in 5 installments as follows: i) Rs.42,200/- on 24.05.2026 ii) Rs.42,200/- on 24.06.2026 iii) Rs.42,200/- on 24.07.2026 iv) Rs.42,200/- on 24.08.2026 v) Rs.42,200/- on 24.09.2026
The above payments to be made to Bank Account off respondent. WHEREFORE, the petitioner most humbly prays thi Hon'ble Court be pleased to place this memo on record, in the ends of justice.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22421 CRL.RP No. 1194 of 2025
2. Counsel for respondent has endorsed no objection on memo.
3. Placing the memo on record, petition stands
disposed off.
4. Amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification.
5. It is made clear that if the balance amount of compensation as agreed in the memo is not paid and if there is any single default, the petitioner shall undergo imprisonment ordered by Trial Magistrate confirmed by the First Appellate Court.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 61