[2026:RJ-JP:25524] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10435/2026 URN: CRLMB / 19350U / 2026 Imran Son of Shri Iqbal, Aged About 24 Years, Resident of Rajasthan, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Fatehpur, Sikar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tayyab Ali Mr. Mirza Shoaib Ur Rehman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 08/07/2026 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner in connection with the FIR No. 99/2026 registered at the Police Station Nechhwa, District Sikar for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 22 and 25 of the NDPS Act, 1985. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the contraband article i.e. 8 grams MDMA has been recovered at the instance of the petitioner which is less than the commercial quantity i.e. 10 grams. Counsel submits that the co-accused person Rashid has already been granted indulgence of bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.07.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10029/2026, therefore, the same indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner as well. [2026:RJ-JP:25524] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10435/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner and submitted that there was no recovery at the instance of the co-accused person- Rashid, the recovery has been effected at the instance of the present petitioner. Counsel submits that the matter is still at the investigation stage, hence the petitioner does not deserve indulgence of bail by this Court. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments raised by learned Public Prosecutor and looking to the fact that the charge-sheet has not been submitted yet and the matter is still at investigation stage, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after submission of charge-sheet and after completion of investigation. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/44