Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9773 (PAT)

Bhushan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./14737/2026 · 2026-04-20

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14737 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2025 Thana- CHANDRADIP District- Jamui ====================================================== 1. Bhushan Yadav S/o Bihari Yadav R/o vill - Itabandh, P.S.- Chandradeep, Distt.- Jamui 2. Pankaj Yadav S/o Maikha Yadav @ Umesh Yadav @ Mairwa Yadav R/o vill - Islamnagar, P.S.- Chandradeep, Distt.- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate Mr. Brajesh Sahay, Advocate Ms. Harshita, Advocate Ms. Amrita Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Md. Matloob Rab, APP For the Informant : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 4 23-04-2026 This case has been listed today under the heading “To Be Mentioned”. 2. Vide order dated 20.04.2026, due to clerical error, the village name of petitioner no.2, namely Pankaj Yadav has been wrongly entered as “Itabandh” in place of “Islamnagar”. 3. As such, it has been prayed by learned counsel for the petitioners that in order dated 20.04.2026, the village name of petitioner no.2, namely Pankaj Yadav be read as “Islamnagar” in place of “Itabandh”. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14737 of 2026(4) dt.23-04-2026 2/2 4. Accordingly, order dated 20.04.2026 stands modified to the extent as indicated above and rest of the matter shall remain intact. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T