- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17301-DB MFA No. 5007 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5007 OF 2019 (MV-) BETWEEN: THE CLAIM MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, 1ST FLOOR,DARE HOUSE, 2ND NSC, BOSE ROAD, CHENNAI - 600 001. BY THE CLAIMS MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, UNIT NO.04, NINTH FLOOR (LEVEL-06), "GOLDEN HEIGHTS" COMPLEX, 59TH "C" CROSS, INDUSTRIAL SUBURB, RAJAJINAGAR 4TH 'M' BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 010. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. O.MAHESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. B.T. PREMA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, W/O. LATE K.N. BHASKAR, Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17301-DB MFA No. 5007 of 2019 2. K.B. SUHAS, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, S/O. LATE K.N. BHASKAR, 3. K.N. NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O LATE NARASAIAH, 4. JAYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O. K.N. NARASIMHAIAH, ALL ARE RESIDING AT: LAKSHMINARASIMHASWAMY NILAYA, NEAR RURAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, SANJAY NAGAR, MYDALA CROSS, KYATHSANDRA, TUMAKURU - 572 101. 5. HONNASIDDAPPA, MAJOR, S/O SADASHIVAIAH, R/O KARADIGERE VILLAGE, MAKANAHALLI POST, HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK - 572 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUDHANVA D S., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4, R5 SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:01.02.2019 PASSED IN MVC NO.390/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE IIND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMAKURU, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.18,75,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 6% P.A. FORM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL DEPOSIT. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17301-DB MFA No. 5007 of 2019 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) When the matter was taken up, the learned counsel for the appellant was not present neither in the first call nor in the revised call, and there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE PK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12 ct-vn