HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28240 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Sudhir Bharti, learned counsel for the respondent- Gaon Sabha. 2. The instant petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents authorities to implement/ the order dated 09.06.2025 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate , Padrauna District Kushinagar / respondent no. 3 in case no. 10864 of 2024 , Computerized Case No.T202405440110864 (Mulki Versus Shahid under section 134 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006( annexure no. 3 to this writ petition) within stipulated period. ii. Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents authorities to consider and decide the application / representation dated 13.02.2026 and 21.05.2026 made by the petitioner before the respondents authorities (annexure no. 5 to this writ petition) , within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the final judgement/ order passed in the proceeding under Section 134 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the order has not been given effect on spot. He further submitted that petitioner has filed an application before the authorities but no steps has been taken by the authorities for implementation / execution of the order passed in the proceeding under Section 134 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Upendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti Mulki Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. I have considered the argument advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records. 5. There is no dispute about the fact that the proceeding under Section 134 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 initiated at the instance of petitioner has been decided by the Sub-Divisional Officer. 6. Under Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, the provision has been prescribed for implementation / execution of the judgement / order passed under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as such, the instant writ petition for implementation / execution of the order cannot be entertained. 7. The instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to initiate proper proceeding for implementation / execution of the order passed in the proceeding under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 in accordance with law. September 23, 2026 Rameez WRIC No. 28240 of 2026 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad