HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14202 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard Shri Aman Arya, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed notices to respondent no.5 is dispensed with. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he was appointed in the Institution in question on adhoc basis, on the post of Assistant Teacher L.T. Grade; and was also issued an appointment letter by the Manager of the Institution on 06.09.1993. Thereafter the District Inspector of Schools, Varanasi has approved the appointment vide its order dated 22.08.1996; where after the services of the petitioner was regularized vide order dated 29.07.2017, passed by the Joint Director of Education, Varanasi Region, under Section 33-G of the U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act 1982, in pursuance of a recommendation dated 20.06.2017. He continued in service and eventually attained the age of superannuation on 31.03.2026; however, the benefit of the services rendered as an adhoc employee is not being computed, for the purposes of grant of pension. He has also submitted a representation on 08.05.2026 before the respondent no.3. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that in case the petitioner makes a fresh representation before the respondent no. 3, the same shall be accorded consideration. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aman Arya, Saumitra Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ramesh Kumar Upadhyay .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. In view of the aforesaid, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the present writ petition pending and on the consent of the parties the writ petition is being decided at the admissions stage itself by providing that in case the petitioner moves a fresh representation for redressal of his grievance along with the certified copy of this order within 7 days from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent no. 3 by passing a reasoned and speaking order, expeditiously, preferably within the further period of two months from the date of receiving of the said representation before him. 6. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed off. September 23, 2026 S.Prakash WRIA No. 14202 of 2026 2 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad