APHC010084322009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1997 OF 2009 Between: 1. TEDLAPU SRINIVASA RAO @ SRINU, S/o T.Narasinga Rao, R/o D.No.50-81-44/4, Seethammapeta, Visakhapatnam. ...Petitioner AND 1. SMT TEDLAPU PYDI LAKSHMI THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, W/o Srinivasa Rao, R/o Palle Veedhi, Malkapuram, Visakhapatnam. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. ...Respondents Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toto set-aside the Order dated 06.07.09 in M.C.No.63/2005 and dismiss the M.C.No.63/2005 on the file of the Judge, Addl. Family Court, Visakhapatnam. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 2787 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the Order dated 06.07.09 in 2 SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1997 of 2009 Dated 10.09.2026 M.C.No.63/2005 and dismiss the M.C.No.63/2005 on the file of the Judge, Addl. Family Court, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the Crl.R.C. Counsel for the Petitioner: G RAMA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondents: JEERU ESWAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondents: LEGAL AID The Court made the following order: 3 SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1997 of 2009 Dated 10.09.2026 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1997 OF 2009 The Court made the following Order: The instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred against the order dated 06-07-2009 in M.C.No.63 of 2005 on the file of the learned Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam. 2. The brief facts of the case are as follows: The respondent, being the wife, filed an application under Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity, ‘the Cr.P.C.’,) seeking maintenance. The learned Family Court, after hearing the parties, has allowed the said Maintenance Case and directed the petitioner herein to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.1500/- to respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of maintenance is exorbitant, and, therefore, the petitioner has filed the instant Criminal Revision Case. 4. The instant Criminal Revision Case is pending since 2009. The amount of maintenance is Rs.1,500/- per month which is very meager one. Accordingly, this Court finds that no merit to interfere with the impugned order. 4 SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1997 of 2009 Dated 10.09.2026 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as devoid of merits. Order of stay granted during the pendency of the case shall stand vacated. The petitioner is directed to comply the order of the learned trial Court by paying maintenance regularly; arrears shall be paid within eight (08) weeks from the date of passing of the order. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated: 10-09-2026 MSI 5 SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1997 of 2009 Dated 10.09.2026 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1997 OF 2009 Dated: 10-09-2026 MSI