Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9764 (RAJ)

ASHU MEDDA URF BURIYA S/O HAMSHU MEDDA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9802/2026 · 2026-07-09

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:25822] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9802/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18128U / 2026 Ashu Medda Urf Buriya S/o Hamshu Medda, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Hanuman Basti, Tharmal Chouraha, Balaji Mandir Ke Pass, Sakatpura, Thana Kunhadi, Kota Raj. Presently Confined In Central Jail Kota. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prithvi Raj Singh Rajawat Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Sandu For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 09/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.156/2026 registered at Police Station Kunadi, District Kota City for offences under Sections 109(1), 189(2), 115(2) and 126(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR. He again submits that no specific act has been attributed to the present petitioner and the allegation of causing life-threatening injuries were on co- accused Sahil. Petitioner is behind the bars since 05.06.2026 [2026:RJ-JP:25822] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9802/2026] without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ashu Medda Urf Buriya S/o Hamshu Medda, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/40