Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9764 (JHR)

GHASIRAM MARDI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/675/2026 · 2026-02-06

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3194 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.675 of 2026 Ghasiram Mardi (Age-47 Years), S/ O-Late Gurucharan Mardi, R/O- Vill.-Khasmahal Bahagar Basti, PO- Tatanagar Golpahari, PS-Parsudih, Dist.-East Singhbhum (Jamshedpur) (Jharkhand). …… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner East Singhbhum, PO+ PS + Dist.-East Singhbhum (Jamshedpur). 3. The Land Reforms Deputy Commissioner, Dhalbhum, Jamshedpur, PO+ PS+ Dist.-East Singhbhum (Jamshedpur). 4. The Circle Officer, Dhalbhum, Jamshedpur, PO + PS + Dist.-East Singhbhum (Jamshedpur). 5. The Circle Officer, Jamshedpur, PO+PS- Jamshedpur Dist.-East Singhbhum (Jamshedpur). 6. The Circle Officer, Karandih, Jamshedpur, PO+PS+Dist.-East Singhbhum (Jamshedpur). …... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioner : Ms. Sunita Kumari, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Ankit Kumar, AC to SC-I --------- 02/Dated: 06 th February, 2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The description of land, as disclosed by the petitioner, is as follows :- “Mouza – Kalimati (Jamshedpur), Khata No.90, Thana No.1163, Plot No.548, Area – 0.025 decimal, PS – Ghatshila, East Singhbhum (Jamshedpur).” 3. The petitioner is praying for settlement, but as per the report, the order, as contained in Annexure – 4 to the writ petition, suggests that it is a raiyati land. A raiyati land cannot be settled to any person. 4. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. Accordingly, the same is, hereby, disposed of. 5. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 06th February, 2026 Ravi-Chandan/- Uploaded on 09.02.2026