M/S SHIDHI VINAYAK CONSTRUCTION v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPMB/618/2026 · 2026-08-05
Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9758 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9758 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
UKHC010136812026
2026:UHC:6858-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY Writ Petition (M/B) No.618 of 2026 5th August, 2026
M/s Shidhi Vinayak Construction -----Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others
----Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. J.C. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT : (per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta C. J.)
1.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
By means of instant writ petition, the petitioner has called in question the decision of the Tender Technical Committee dated 29.07.2026 whereby the bid of the petitioner has been declared as non-responsive.
3.
Shri Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondents have opened the financial bids and the L1 bid is lower than the bid of the petitioner, therefore, in any event, the challenge does not survive.
1
UKHC010136812026
2026:UHC:6858-DB
4.
In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed.
5.
Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C. J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 05.08.2026 SS
2