Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9757 (PNJ)

SHEENAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/4151/2026 · 2026-04-09

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP- 4151-20 IN THE (162) SHEENAM AND STATE OF PUN CORAM: HON Present: Mr. G Ms. R **** MANISHA BAT 1. The Constitution of I official responden the hands of resp dated 08.04.2026 2. At t submitted that the (Annexure P-5) raising their griev not yet been con submitted that at directions are issu Muktsar Sahib to take necessary act 2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER Versus PUNJAB AND ORS. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Gurmandeep Singh Dhillon, Adv Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG ****  BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed n of India seeking issuance of a wr ondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life a f respondents No.4 to 7 and to take .2026 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned coun hat the petitioners have recently filed a 5) before the Senior Superintenden r grievances as mentioned in the pres en considered and no action has be that at this stage, the petitioners wou re issued to respondent No.2- Senior hib to decide the aforesaid representat ary action thereon. JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRWP- 4151-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 09.04.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA  n, Advocate for the petitioners DAG, Punjab filed under Article 226/227 of the a writ of mandamus directing the e life and liberty of the petitioners at take action on their representation counsel for the petitioners has filed a representation on 08.04.2026 tendent of Police, Sri Muktsar Sahib e present petition but the same has as been taken thereon. He further rs would be satisfied if appropriate Senior Superintendent of Police, Sri sentation filed by the petitioners and 2026 f the the rs at ation has 2026 ahib has rther riate , Sri s and AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.09 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP- 4151-20 3. Notic 4. Ms. on behalf of the r due course. Let a course of the day. 5. In vi commenting anyt of at this stage w representation da period of 15 days law. Needless to respondents woul and liberty.  09.04.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (2) Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DA f the respondents-State and submits th . Let a complete set of the paperbook e day. In view of the limited prayer mad g anything on the merits of the case, t stage with a direction to respondent ion dated 08.04.2026 (Annexure P- 5 days from today, by passing a spea ess to say, if any threat is found t s would provide them adequate securi (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes    DAG, Punjab has advance notice mits that the needful will be done in rbook be supplied to her during the r made by the petitioners, without case, the present petition is disposed ndent No.2 to decide the aforesaid -5) of the petitioners within a speaking order in accordance with und to the petitioners, the official security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE  Yes/No   otice ne in g the thout osed esaid in a with ficial r life AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.09 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.