Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
UKHC010007472024
2026:UHC:7680 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/163/2024
Tarun Panwar
--Petitioner Versus Kumud D Vaiyda
--Respondent
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
1. Mr. Dushyant Mainali,
learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Piyush Garg, learned consel for the respondents.
3. Petitioner has challenged
order dated 04.12.2023 passed by learned District Judge, Dehradun in Civil Revision No. 198/2023. By the said order, trial court’s order dated 07.11.2023 passed in Original Suit No. 460 of 2014 was stayed.
4. Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that Civil Revision No. 198 of 2023 was decided on 15.11.2025. He thus submits that the writ petition has now become infructuous.
5. Since the civil revision, in which an interlocutory order was passed itself has been decided, therefore, the claim in the writ petition, do not survive.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
24.08.2026 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f 9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26 F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.24 05:40:38 -07'00'