Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9754 (CAL)

UDITANSHU BOSE @ RIMO v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/2813/2025 · 2026-04-17

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L4 17.04.2026 Bpg. Dismissed as not pressed C.R.M. (M) 2813 of 2025 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Uditanshu Bose @ Rimo Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Rajnandini Das. …for the petitioner. Mr. Binoy Kumar Panda Mr. Akash Ganguly. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that she has instructions not to proceed with the bail application. Learned advocate for the State is present. Written instructions filed by the petitioner be kept with the record. In view of the submissions advanced by the petitioner, the application for bail being CRM(M)2813 of 2025 is dismissed as not pressed. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 2