Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9752 (PAT)

Raju Kumar @ Guddu Kumar @ Guddu Rai v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./17284/2026 · 2026-03-23

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17284 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2025 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Raju Kumar @ Guddu Kumar @ Guddu Rai S/O Dhaneshwar Ray R/O Village - Shankarpatti, Police Station- Rampur Hari, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar S.K., Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 23-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No.102 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(6) of the BNS and later on Sections 317(2) & 317(4) of the BNS were also added. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that some unknown miscreants have snatched the E-rickshaw and Rs.2,500/- from the informant. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the FIR was lodged againt unknown miscreants. The petitioner was remanded in this case from Rampu Hari P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025 wherein he has given his confessional statement. It has further been submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. He has been Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17284 of 2026(2) dt.23-03-2026 2/2 framed in this case as he is having criminal antecedent of six cases. It has further been submitted that similarly situated co- accused persons have been granted bail by the learned Co-ordinate Bench vide Cr. Misc. No. 30498 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court of Judicial Magistrate- 1st Class, Muzaffarpur (East) in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No.102 of 2025. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T