Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRP No. 1497 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRP No. 1497 of 2026 & CMP.No.7128 of 2026 K.Sivakami Rep. by Power of Attorney R.Karuppusamy, D.No.4/40, Kallumettuppalayam, Pongalur, Palladam, Tiruppur District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. Varadharaja Perumal Temple Rep by its Fit Person, Manjapur.
2. The District Collector Tiruppur.
3. The Tahsildar Palladam Taluk, Palladam.
4. The Assistant Commissioner HR and CE Department, Tiruppur. ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to set aside the docket order dated 26.02.2026 passed in IA No.2 of 2026 in AS No.52 of 2025 on the file of the First Additional District Court, Tiruppur may allow the CRP. For Petitioner(s): Mrs.R.Hemalatha https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP No. 1497 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Sathish – R2 to R4 ORDER Challenging the endorsement made by the ameen, the petitioner had preferred this Civil Revision Petition.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the ameen has made an endorsement that after due verification, he found that there is no such temple office existing as per the address submitted by the petitioner. It is the contention of the petitioner that the ameen had made an endorsement in the summon that there is no temple office in the address of the respondent and subsequently, an endorsement has been made stating that ‘office is not functioning’ by some body else.
3. Admittedly, even as per the endorsement of the ameen, after due verification he found that in the address of the respondent, there is no such temple office in existence. Even the other endorsement made subsequently, after the endorsement of the ameen, the same also reveals that there is no such office in existence. Hence, I do not find any merits in this revision. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP No. 1497 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
4. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 12-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No vrc To
1. The I Additional District Judge, Tiruppur.
2. The District Collector Tiruppur.
3. The Tahsildar Palladam Taluk, Palladam.
4. The Assistant Commissioner HR and CE Department, Tiruppur. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP No. 1497 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J. vrc CRP No. 1497 of 2026 12-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis