Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9751 (RAJ)

DEEPAK KUAWAL SON OF SHRI NEMICHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSA/1615/2025 · 2026-07-07

Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:25372-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 1615/2025 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No.26/2025 URN: SOSA / 3166U / 2025 Deepak Kuawal Son Of Shri Nemichand, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Naya Ghar Gulab Badi P.s. Alwar Gate, Ajmer Rajasthan (Accused Appellant Is Confined In Central Jail Bundi ) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Tyagi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Chaudhary, GA-cum-AAG Mr. Aman Kumar Ms. Neha Goyal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 07/07/2026 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the applicant along with the appeal. 2. Counsel for the applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that the sentence of life imprisonment has been awarded to the applicant under Section 302, 397, 120 of IPC and he is in judicial custody. Counsel further submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter and case of the petitioner is similar to that of co-accused-Divyansh whose sentence has already been suspended by this Court vide order dated 10.09.2025 passed in D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.2462/2024. Counsel further submits that [2026:RJ-JP:25372-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-1615/2025] the applicant has served the sentence of about five years and hearing of appeal may take long time and prayed that sentence awarded to the applicant may be suspended and he be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 3. Learned GA-cum-AAG opposed the application for suspension of sentence. 4. We have heard counsels for the parties and perused the record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that sentence of co-accused namely-Divyansh has already been suspended by this Court and also considering the period of custody and the hearing of appeal may take long time, we deem it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application. 6. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 11.08.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J 3/JYOTI/362