HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10234/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18965U / 2026 Munister @ Minister S/o Charatlal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Pareeta, P.S. Kudgaon, District Karauli, Rajasthan. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Sub Jail Gangapur City). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.K. Dixit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat-PP with Mr. Shubham Sain JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 07/07/2026 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner in connection with the FIR No. 48/2026 registered at the Police Station Batoda, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences punishable under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the recovery of 14.43 gram of smack has been effected at the instance of the petitioner. Counsel submits that the petitioner is not a drug dealer rather he is a drug addict. Counsel submits that the petitioner has been in custody since the date of his arrest and after investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted. Counsel further submits that the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10234/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner and submits that the petitioner is habitual offender against whom one more case under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act has been registered wherein the petitioner has been charge-sheeted, hence, the petitioner does not deserve indulgence of bail. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments raised by learned Public Prosecutor and looking to the fact that one more case of similar nature is lying pending against the petitioner, hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the present bail application stands dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after recording the statements of the Seizure Officer. The Trial Court is directed to record the statements of the Seizure Officer on priority basis. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/60