HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34032 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Pranshu Gupta, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State. 1A. Learned counsel for the applicants hands up the supplementary affidavit explaining the criminal history, the same is taken on record. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant/ accused- Vinod to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 151 of 2026, under Sections 115(2), 352, 131, 118(1), 351(3), 109(1) BNS, P.S.- Bahsuma, District- Meerut, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the informant and accused persons are of same family. The informant is married to real brother of the accused/applicant. The FIR dated 02.08.2026 lodged against three persons including the accused/applicant, wherein two other accused are brother and sister of the accused/applicant. The informant Smt. Neetu has lodged the FIR with the allegation that she was married to Manoj, the brother of accused/applicant in the month of February 2025, subsequently there was some dispute between her , her husband and in- laws. It is due to this dispute that there was a cross fight between the parties, on 01.08.2026 at about 1:00 p.m., wherein informant and her husband Manoj suffered injuries. Three injuries are suffered by the informant and eight injuries was suffered by Manoj, all the injuries are simple in nature except one, which is fracture of the frontal bone. It is further contended that due to the cross fight Pooja one of the co-accused Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pranshu Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinod .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) suffered injuries, whose injury report is at page no. 59 of the application. The applicant tried to lodged the cross FIR but the same was not registered, which led her to move an application under Section 173(4) BNSS. There is no specific role attributed on the accused/applicant. The weapon used shown in the FIR is iron rod. There is no recovery. The investigation is continuing. The accused/applicant has criminal history of two cases and in both the cases, he is on bail. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since 04.08.2026 and cooperating in the investigation. He seeks to be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. for State and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail. 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considering the cross fight between the parties, which led to the injuries on both the sides as they are the family members and cross version of the FIR, the accused/applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 23, 2026 Abhishek Sri. BAIL No. 34032 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK RANJAN SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad