1/2 22 CARBP-882-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 882 OF 2026 Chintan Arvind Shah … Petitioner Vs. Harmya Developers formerly known as Valram Corporation … Respondent _______ Ms. Fatema Tankiwala i/b LJ Law for Petitioners/Claimants. _______ CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 21 st September, 2026. P.C. 1. The Petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by which the Applicant has sought further period of four months to enable the Arbitral Tribunal to complete the arbitration proceedings and publish the Arbitral Award. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, at the outset, points out that the Respondent has not been appearing before the Arbitral Tribunal and the proceedings are therefore, ex-parte. Sairaj SAIRAJ SANJAY KARANDE Digitally signed by SAIRAJ SANJAY KARANDE Date: 2026.09.22 10:57:17 +0530 2/2 22 CARBP-882-2026.DOC 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner also points out that the copy of the Petition has been served upon the Respondent. Despite this, none has appeared today. 4. Having heard learned counsel and having perused the record, all that now remains is only passing of Arbitral Award. I am satisfied that the Petitioner has shown sufficient cause. The requirements of Section 29A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 have been made out and therefore, it would be in substantive interest of justice to extend the time as prayed for. 5. Therefore, Arbitration Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 6. The extended time shall commence from the date on which the copy of order is uploaded. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) Sairaj