Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9740 (ALL)

CHANDAN YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WPIL/2288/2026 · 2026-09-22

Arun Kumar

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2288 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh with better particulars, after annexing relevant materials in support of petitioner's grievance and seeking appropriate reliefs. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Prem Bahadur Singh, holding brief of Sri R. P. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent Gaon Sabha have no objection. 3. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. September 23, 2026 Ashok Kr. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Kumar Singh, Upasana Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla (Arun Kumar,J.) Chandan Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad