Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9735 (RAJ)

SHYAM SUNDER BISHNOI S/O SHRI SANT RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CCP/113/2026 · 2026-06-30

Maneesh Sharma, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24006-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 113/2026 URN: CCP / 127U / 2026 In D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.825/2022 Shyam Sunder Bishnoi S/o Shri Sant Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Sector-2, Near Jaimata Tent Palace, M.P. Colony, Bikaner, Rajasthan-334004. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Shri Bhaskar A. Sawant, Secretary To Government, Home Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Smt. Tejaswini Gautam, Superintendent of Police Kota, (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Samee Khan, AAAG HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 30/06/2026 1. Heard on application (No.1/2026) for substituting respondent in the cause title. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Amended cause-title is taken on record. 3. It is informed by learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the order sought to be implemented, has been [2026:RJ-JP:24006-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-113/2026] challenged before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and an interim order has been passed staying the operation of the High Court’s order. 4. In view of the above, the rights of the parties shall now be governed by the final judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and, therefore, contempt petition would not lie. 5. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed. 6. Notices stand discharged. (MANEESH SHARMA),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ N.GANDHI/RAJAT/71