IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Shreyans Industries through its Proprietor Sh. State of Punjab and another CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Chetan Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. (through video conferencing) Mr. DEEPAK SIBAL Learn case is covered in its favour by a recent judgment of a Co this Court dated 20.02.2026 Union of India and another. 2. In the light of the afore consensus, the present petition is allowed in terms of M/s Bansal Casting’s the impugned show cause notice da petitioner’s registration dated 04.02.2026 authorities to proceed April 01, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.137 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7796- Date of Decision : hreyans Industries through its Proprietor Sh. Rahul Jain Versus State of Punjab and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Chetan Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. (through video conferencing) Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Additional A.G., Punjab. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem case is covered in its favour by a recent judgment of a Co this Court dated 20.02.2026 CWP No.16770 of 2024 Union of India and another. In the light of the afore consensus, the present petition is allowed M/s Bansal Casting’s case (supra) resulting in the setting aside of the impugned show cause notice dated 09.05.2025 and the order cancelling the s registration dated 04.02.2026 with liberty to the respondent proceed afresh against the petitioner (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 01.04.2026 Rahul Jain …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Saurabh Kapoor, Additional A.G., Punjab. ed counsel for the parties are ad idem that the petitioner’s case is covered in its favour by a recent judgment of a Co-ordinate Bench of No.16770 of 2024 – M/s Bansal Casting vs. In the light of the afore consensus, the present petition is allowed case (supra) resulting in the setting aside of ted 09.05.2025 and the order cancelling the with liberty to the respondent- against the petitioner, in accordance with law. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.04.07 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document