[2026:RJ-JP:10224] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 86/2026 Rahul Khan S/o Munshi Khan, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Nagal Todiyar Police Station Malakhera, District Alwar (Rajasthan). (At Present Detained In District Jail, Alwar) ----Appellant Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Laxman Ram S/o Harchand Bairava, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Nagal Todiyar Police Station Malakhera, District Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Shubham Agarwal Mr. J.P. Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Anupam Sharma for Complainant HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI Order 10/03/2026 1. Learned counsel Mr. Anupam Sharma puts in appearance on behalf of respondent No. 2, therefore, service is complete. 2. Heard learned counsel of the parties as well as perused the material available on record. 3. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 14-A of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amended Act, 2015, who has been arrested in connection with the FIR No.0535/2025 dated 27.11.2025 registered at the Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar, for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 74, 352, 332 (a), 109(1) of BNS, 3/25 of Arms Act and 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va), 3(1)(w) of SC/ST Act, against [2026:RJ-JP:10224] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-86/2026] the order dated 06.01.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Alwar in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application, CIS No. 429/2025, whereby, the bail application preferred on behalf of the appellant was rejected. 4. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is falsely implicated in the case while alleging that the appellant has caused serious injuries to the complainant. While drawing attention towards the charge-sheet, learned counsel for the appellant further submits that the present appellant has no criminal antecedents and the injuries caused to the injured are simple in nature and none of the injuries is grievous or dangerous to life, therefore, the appellant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 5. Charge-sheet is taken on record. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant opposes the appeal; however, he is not in a position to refute the fact that the appellant was named in the FIR and the injuries suffered by the injured are simple in nature and further no specific allegation has been levelled against the appellant. 7. Thus, having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the order rejecting the application for bail filed on behalf of the appellant, cannot be sustained and deserves to be set aside. 8. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 06.01.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge, [2026:RJ-JP:10224] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-86/2026] SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Alwar in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application, CIS No. 429/2025 is quashed and set aside. It is ordered that the accused/appellant Rahul Khan S/o Munshi Khan, arrested in connection with FIR No.0535/2025 dated 27.11.2025 registered at the Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar, shall be released on appeal; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, with a stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (DR.NUPUR BHATI),J RAVINDRA KUMAR /46