Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9728 (GAU)

Nixon Lego v. The State of AP and 3 Ors

WP(C)/320/2026 · 2026-07-19

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040010732026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/320/2026 Nixon Lego Son of Late D S Lego, resident of P Sector Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : (Department of Urban Affairs) Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Secretary (Urban Development) Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 4:Hano Taka Age: 0 Occupation : Joint Director IT and C presently serving as Director Urban Local Body Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar Advocate for the Petitioner : Nalo Pada, Joshep Gao,Takom Roleng,Juel Saroh,Bomnya Kamdak Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 20-07-2026 Mr. N. Pada, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file afresh. Mr. N. Ratan, learned Additional Advocate General for the State respondents and Mr. T. Omo, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 are present. Prayer for withdrawal is accepted. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant