[2026:RJ-JP:25320-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 426/2026 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No.95/2026 URN: SOSA / 852U / 2026 A @ G1 (Juvenile In Conflict With Law), Son Of Shri Rajesh, Aged About 17 Years, R/o Vidhyasagar Nagar, Rang Talab, Police Station Railway Colony, Kota City Throush His Father Rajesh Son Of Shri Prahlad R/o Vidhyasagar Nagar, Rang Talab, Police Sta- tion Railway Colony, Kota City(At Present Confined In The Cen- tral Jail, Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta with Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma Mr. Lokesh Gopaliya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, Addl.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 07/07/2026 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the accused-applicant along with the appeal. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has been convicted and sentenced for the offences under Sections 302/34, 341 of IPC and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that the accused-applicant is at present confined in [2026:RJ-JP:25320-DB] (2 of 3) [SOSA-426/2026] the Central Jail, Kota. He further submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter and he has served the sentence for a period of more than five years. He further submits that the accused-applicant was juvenile at the time of alleged offence(s) and similarly situated co-accused persons have already been acquitted by the learned Trial Court in a separate trial. He further submits that the appeal is not likely to be heard in near future and prayed that sentence awarded to the accused-applicants may be suspended and they be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the application for suspension of sentence. 6. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, and also considering the period of custody and the fact that the accused-applicant was juvenile at the time of alleged offence(s) and the hearing of appeal may take long time, we deem it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application. 8. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 11.08.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:25320-DB] (3 of 3) [SOSA-426/2026] 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compli- ance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Upendra Pratap Singh/16