D/L42 21.04.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (NDPS)711 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Hili Police Station Case No.58 of 2025 dated 21.03.2025 under Sections 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/27A/28 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and 27a/27(b)(ii)/27A Drugs and Cosmetics Act; Mano Mahato Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Kaushik Choudhury Mr. Dwaipayan Panda. …for the petitioner. Mr. Soumik Ganguly Ms. Rajashree Tah. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 1 year 1 month and till date only charges have been framed and witness action has not commenced. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the seizure being 100 bottles of Phensedyl and Yaba Tablets. The totality of which reflects that the same is of commercial quantity. Petitioner claims that he is only associated with the 100 bottles of Phensedyl. Be that as it may, petitioner will renew his prayer for bail 2 after the evidence of the seizure list witnesses are over. Accordingly, the learned trial court is directed to prepone the examination of seizure list witnesses particularly with regard to seizure list 100 bottles of Phensedyl and Tapentadol. With the aforesaid observations, at this stage, the application for bail being CRM(NDPS)711 of 2026 is dismissed. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)