Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010111992026 2026:GAU-AS:9756 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1864/2026 ANANTA BOIRAGI S/O SUDHA BOIRAGI R/O RAJAGAON, WARD NO.1, MOUZA AND P.S. MORIGAON, DIST.- MORIGAON, ASSAM PIN- 782105 VERSUS PRAMILA KALITA D/O LATE KAN KALITA ALIAS KULU W/O HAREN BARUAH VILL- BAKARIGAON, WARD NO. 4, MOUZA AND P.S. MORIGAON, DIST.- MORIGAON, ASSAM. PIN- 782105. 2:SRI PRANAB CHOUDHURI S/O UTTAM CHOUDHURI 3:SRI DIBYA NATH C/O TEACHER SANKARDEV BIDYA NIKETON 4:SRI LALITA BORA C/O TEACHER SANKARDEV BIDYA NIKETON 5:SRI AMULYA NATH C/O TEACHER SANKARDEV BIDYA NIKETON VILL.- RAJAGAON P.S. AND DIST.- MORIGAON ASSAM. 6:SRI BADAN MEDHI S/O LATE TATAK KALITA ALIAS JATARA KALITA 7:SRI CHANDRA MOHAN MEDHI S/O PHSAU KALITA 8:SRI DAMUDAR MEDHI S/O LATE GERAI KALITA ALL ARE RESIDENT OF- VILL- RAJAGAON WARD NO. 1 Page No.# 2/3 MOUZA -MORIGAON P.S. MORIGAON DIST- MORIGAON ASSAM. 9:SMTI MADHU KALITA W/O GUNADHAR BORA VILL- NAOKATA P.S. AND DIST- MORIGAON ASSAM 10:SMTI PUNI MEDHI W/O LATE LALOWA MEDHI VILL.- GASBARI P.S. AND DIST.- MORIGAON ASSAM 11:SMTI TURTURI KALITA W/O LATE BUDHIRAM KALITA VILL.-NAOKATA, P.S. AND DIST.- MORIGAON ASSAM. 12:SRI SUBHAN BORDOLOI S/O KALIA BORDOLOI VILL.-JAJORI, P.S.- JAJORI DIST.- MORIGAON ASSAM. 13:SRI DIMBESWAR MEDHI S/O LATE TATAK KALITA ALIAS TATARA 14:SRI PIPI MEDHI S/O LATE TATAK KALITA ALIAS TATARA BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF- VILL.- RAJAGAON WARD NO. 1 P.S. AND MOUZA- MORIGAON DIST.- MORIGAON ASSAM .PROFORMA OPPO. PARTIE Advocate for the Petitioner : DARAK ULLAH, R MANDAL,S K PODDAR,MR. C SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A C SARMA, MR. P MEDHI (R1) BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 17.07.2026 Heard Mr. Darak Ullah, learned counsel for the applicant and also heard Ms. H. Page No.# 3/3 Kalita, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A.C. Sarma, learned Senior counsel for the respondent/opposite party No.1. This application under Order XXII Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure is preferred by the applicant for substitution of legal heirs of the respondent No.14, who suffered demise on 14.04.2026. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has preferred one regular second appeal, being RSA No.175/2025 and in the said RSA No.175/2025, the respondent No.14 suffered demise and as such, there is a requirement of bringing on record the legal heirs of the said respondent and as such, he has contended to allow this application. The learned counsel for the opposite party No.1 submits that she has no objection. Accordingly, taking note of the submission of learned counsel for both the parties, this interlocutory application stands allowed. The legal representatives of respondent No.14 be substituted in the RSA No.175/2025. In terms of above, this I.A. stands disposed of. The learned counsel for the applicant shall file amended cause title in the RSA No.175/2025 within a period of 10(ten) days from today. Comparing Assistant Sd/- Robin Phukan JUDGE