G.Krishna Murthy v. The Regional Joint Director of School Education
WP/16787/2006 · 2026-09-10
Sumathi Jagadam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9725 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9725 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010422702006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16787/2006 Between:
1. G.KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O.VENUGOPALAN HEAD MASTER GANDHI CENTENARY HIGH SCHOOL KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
2. G.RAMA KRISHNA SASTRT, S/O.SURYANARAYANA HINDI PANDIT GANDHI CENTENARY HIGH SCHOOL KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER EAST GODAVARI, AT KAKINADA
3. THE SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT GANDHI CENTENARY, SCHOOL, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in directing not to attend the duties as 3 months notice period was over even during the pendency of the representation/appeal before the respondents 1 and 2 as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14,16 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to continue the petitioners in service and pass
2
IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 21032 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to continue the petitioners in service as Head master and Hindi Pandit pending the disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. S GIRIMOJI RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
2. VL N G K MURTHY
3
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri S.Girimoji Rao, learned counsel for the writ petitioners, submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 11.09.2026
PSK
4
24 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No: 16787/2006
Date: 11.09.2026
W PSK