[2026:RJ-JP:25436] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9800/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18126U / 2026 Rahul S/o Shri Kaptan Singh, R/o Somli, Police Station Rajakhera, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined in District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat-PP with Mr. Shubham Sain Mr. Mohd. Shahid Hasan JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 07/07/2026 1. The instant anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S has been filed by the petitioner, apprehending his arrest in connection with the FIR No. 284/2025, registered at the Police Station Raja Khera, District Dholpur for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 109(2), 352, 351(2) and 112(2) of BNS. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been named in the aforesaid FIR. Counsel submits that the FIR was registered against certain accused persons, who were identified and they were arrested and granted regular bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.09.2025 and by this Court vide order dated 15.10.2025. Counsel submits that there is no evidence against the petitioner to connect him with the [2026:RJ-JP:25436] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9800/2026] alleged incident, therefore, indulgence of anticipatory bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant opposed the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner and submitted that the co-accused persons came on the petitioner’s motor bike and committed the offence against the injured. Hence, a prima facie role of the petitioner is made for connecting him with the alleged incident, therefore, the petitioner does not deserve the benefit of anticipatory bail and his application is liable to be rejected. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments raised by learned Public Prosecutor and looking to the gravity of the matter, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the instant bail application is dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to surrender before the Court concerned. In case, the petitioner surrenders before the Court concerned and applies for regular bail, the Trial Court would decide the same expeditiously as early as possible, strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/76