Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 972 (BOM)

RATTAN INDIA POWER LIMITED, AMRAVATI, THR. P.O.A., RAVINDRA SITARAM TARLE v. THE UNION OF INDIA THR. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPT. OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI AND ORS.

MCA/178/2026 · 2026-04-10

Nivedita Prakash Mehta, Shri Anil L Pansare

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

907-MCA-178-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 178 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4145 OF 2024 (D) (Rattan India Power Limited Vs. The Union of India & Ors.) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Mr. Prakash Shah, Senior Counsel with Mr. A.M. Sudame, Counsel for the applicant. Ms Ketki Jaltare – Vaidya, Counsel for the respondents. ..... CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. APRIL 10, 2026 The order is sought to be recalled on the count that the Counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 4145/2024 was, in fact, not present, however, his presence is noted. Mr. Prakash Shah, learned Senior Counsel, submits that he would not press this ground, but would request to recall the order, considering the fact that the issue of jurisdiction and challenge to the Notification was made. 2] That being so, though we do not certify that Mr. A.M. Sudame, Counsel, was not present on that day, considering other grounds, we recall order dated 23/1/2026 passed in Writ Petition No. 4145/2024. The Writ Petition is restored to file. 3] The application is disposed of. WRIT PETITION NO. 4145/2024 4] List for further consideration after two weeks. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Sumit