Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9719 (HP)

RAM LAL THAKUR v. Satluj Jal Vidhut Nigam Ltd. through Managing Director SJVNL

CWP/1718/2026 · 2026-05-06

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:15051 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.1718 of 2026 Decided on : 06.05.2026 Ram Lal Thakur Petitioner Versus Satluj Jal Vidhut Nigam through Managing Director Respondents. Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr.Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate. For the respondents: Respondents No.1 & 2 stand deleted. Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:- a)“ A writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be issued and the order dated 23.12.2025 Annexure P-5 may kindly be quashed and set aside in view of the submissions made herein supra. b). that the writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued and the respondents may kindly be directed to give the additional consultation fee as per notification issued by the respondent No.3 from time to time amounting to Rs.13,50,000/- with interest at the Rate of 12% per annum from October 2020 to its realization. c). That the respondent may kindly be directed to give all the consequential benefit to the petitioner during the pendency of the present writ petition.” 2. Though, Ms. Sneh Bhimta, learned Counsel submitted that reply is ready, however, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. 2026:HHC:15051 that the case is squarely covered by the Judgment dated 19th March,2026 passed by the Hon’ble Coordinate Bench of this Court in Lal Chand Shastri vs Union of India and others, in CWP No.3212 of 2026. This fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent-SJVNL Ltd. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the observation that the directions passed by the Hon’ble Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.3212 of 2026 titled Lal Chand Shastri vs Union of India and others, shall be construed to have been passed in the present petition also in favour of the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 06, 2026 (meera)