Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9714 (CAL)

AZIZ MALLICK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/6107/2026 · 2026-04-20

Suvra Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20.04.2026 rc/ct.no.15 Item No.63 WPA No. 6107 of 2026 Aziz Mallick Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Habibur Rahaman Mr. Archishman Singh Mr. Mehabuba Rahaman ..for the petitioner Mr. Robiul Islam Mr. Masooq Rahman …for the respondent no. 9 Mr. Moniruzzaman Mr. Jahangir Badsha Mr. Sk. Nasib Ali …for the respondents no. 9,100 & 11 Mr. Biswajit De …for the State Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record. None appears for the Panchayat despite service. The petitioner alleges unauthorized construction raised by the private respondents in violation of an order passed by the learned Civil Court. Learned counsel for the private respondents denies such allegation. In view of the fact that the Civil Court is in seisin of the matter and the petitioner alleges violation of orders passed by the learned Civil Court, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the Civil Court for redressal of his grievance. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh,J) 2