2026:JHHC:7102 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11079 of 2025 Madde @ Deepak Mahli, aged about 29 years, Son of Ashok Mahli, Resident of Railway Colony, Water Colony, Chutia, P.O. G.P.O. Ranchi, P.S. Chutia, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the J.U.V.N.L. : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel --- 06/16.03.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 25.07.2025 in connection with Chutia P.S. Case No. 163 of 2025, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 305(e) & 112 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the maximum punishment that can be imposed for the alleged offence against the petitioner is up to seven years. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and four co-accused persons have been enlarged on bail in B.A. No. 11512 of 2025 vide order dated 19.02.2026. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the JUVNL has opposed the prayer and has submitted that the public property has been stolen away and as per the case diary a part of the stolen property has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner also has criminal antecedent and he was identified in the CCTV footage with respect to the place of occurrence. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there is recovery from the possession of the 2026:JHHC:7102 2 petitioner and he has also been identified in the CCTV footage and has one criminal antecedent, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. The case of the petitioner does not fall on similar footing as that of other co-accused persons who have been enlarged on bail. 7. The instant bail application is hereby rejected. 8. Let a copy of this be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 16.03.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-17.03.2026