VINOD KUMAR GUPTA & ANR. v. GOVT (THE NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.
W.P.(C)/4275/2026 · 2026-04-02
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 971 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 971 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4275/2026 VINOD KUMAR GUPTA & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prakhar Sharma, Mr. Kapil Kumar, Ms. Piya Uppal, Mr. Ayush Malik, Ms. Saumya Beki, Addvocates. versus GOVT (THE NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh, Adv., Ms. Laqshyaa Saluja, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Sandeep Tyagi SPC for R-2.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R %
02.04.2026
1. The petition is for the following reliefs:
“a. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent No. 1 to decide the application filed by the petitioners herein under Section 22 of Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens (Amendment) Rules, 2017, in time bound manner; b. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent No. 2 to ensure the protection, safety, personal life of the petitioners and safeguard the use of their property;”
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for expeditious disposal of the application which has been presented under Section 22 of the Delhi This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 13:17:37
Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens (Amendment) Rules, 2017. The petitioners claim to be the owner of the property in question and on account of the illegal possession by respondent no.3, the petitioners are being unnecessarily harassed.
3. There seems to be certain videos, placed on record by the petitioners, which, prima facie, reflect that the petitioners were being beaten up.
4. The Court, however, at this stage, is not considering the merits of the dispute and instead directs the concerned Authority to decide the petitioner’s case with due expedition within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order passed today.
5.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 submits that the next date of hearing stands fixed as 07.04.2026. Let the parties to fully cooperate in expeditious disposal of the petitioners’ application.
6. With respect to any alleged criminal act of one of respondents, the concerned Police Station is directed to look into the petitioners’ grievance and take necessary action.
7. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J APRIL 2, 2026 aks This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 13:17:37