D.Sathishkumar v. Joint Commissioner / Executive Officer
WA/660/2026 · 2026-03-09
N Senthilkumar, R Suresh Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9706 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9706 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.A.No.660 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.03.2026
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR W.A.No.660 of 2026 D.Sathishkumar .. Appellant Vs.
1. Joint Commissioner / Executive Officer Arulmigu Arunachaleswarar Thirukoil Thiruvannamalai 606 601.
2. Fit Person / Chairman Board of Trustees Arulmigu Arunachaleswarar Thirukoil Thiruvannamalai 606 601. .. Respondents Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order made in W.P.No.5639 of 2026 dated 16.02.2024. For the Appellant : Mr.R.Sudharsan For the Respondents : Mr.S.Ravichandran Additional Government Pleader
JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) The challenge that was made before the Writ Court is against the suspension order dated 05.04.2025 issued by the second respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.660 of 2026
2. Before the Writ Court, it was assured on behalf of the respondents that, within four weeks’ time, the enquiry would be completed, therefore, recording the same, the writ petition was dismissed through the order impugned dated 16.02.2026 in W.P.No.5639 of 2026.
3. Heard Mr.R.Sudharsan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Ravichandran, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.
4. The learned Additional Government Pleader would submit that, since the allegation made against the appellant/writ petitioner is an alleged sexual harassment, as complained by one of the women employee, as per the mandate of Vishaka’s case, a Committee has been constituted by issuance of proceedings dated 06.03.2026 and that Committee would conduct an enquiry and give a report, based on which, further course of action would be decided by the Disciplinary Authority and he would also submit that, the Committee would complete the enquiry and file a report within four weeks’ period. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.660 of 2026
5. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant/writ petitioner would submit that, though he was suspended on 05.04.2025, till date, no subsistence allowance has been paid to him.
6. If that is so, since the appellant/writ petitioner is entitled to get subsistence allowance, the same shall be calculated and be paid, with arrears, from the date of suspension and continued to be paid until the suspension is revoked or till further orders are passed pursuant to the enquiry initiated against him.
7. With these directions, the writ appeal is disposed. No costs. Consequently, C.M.P.No.6270 of 2026 is closed.
(R.S.K., J.) (N.S., J) 09.03.2026 Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No (drm) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.660 of 2026 To:
1. Joint Commissioner / Executive Officer Arulmigu Arunachaleswarar Thirukoil Thiruvannamalai 606 601.
2. Fit Person / Chairman Board of Trustees Arulmigu Arunachaleswarar Thirukoil Thiruvannamalai 606 601. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.660 of 2026 R. SURESH KUMAR, J. AND N. SENTHILKUMAR, J. (drm) W.A.No.660 of 2026 09.03.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis