Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9705 (AP)

T. Zakeer S/o Karim Sab, Proprietor, v. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its

WP/864/2016 · 2026-09-10

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010479422016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 864/2016 Between: 1. T. ZAKEER S/O KARIM SAB, PROPRIETOR,, M/S TAPPAL FLOUR MILL, 2/143, UPPAR STREET, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, POWER AND ENERGY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. ANDHRA PRADESH SOUTHERN POWER, DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, (OPERATIONS), ADONI. 3. THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, (OPERATIONS) SUB DIVISION, APSPDCL, YEMMIGANUR 4. THE ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT ENGINEER, (OPERATIONS) APSPDCL, YEMMIGANUR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the impugned action of the 4th respondent herein in. issuing Lr. No. AE/0/Ymg/F. No./D.No. 497/16 dated 2-01-2016 stating that necessary approvals may be furnished on or before 4-1-2016 other wise the service will be disconnected without further notice is arbitrary, illegal, capricious, high handed, violative of Articles 14, 19 (1) (g), 21 and the 2 guarantee under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India apart from being in violation of the statutory provisions of the Electricity Act and the Rules made there under apart from being in violation of the principles of natural justice and fair play and consequently direct the 4th respondent herein to continue the power supply to the premises bearing Door Nos. 2/143 and 144 of Uppar Street, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District without disconnecting the same in any manner whatsoever IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 1047 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent herein to not to disconnect the power supply to the premises bearing Door No. 2/143 and 144 of Uppar Street, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District on any pretext whatsoever, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T S ANAND Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENERGY (AP) 2. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL 3. JAGARLAMUDIKOTESWARIDEVI(SC FORAPSPDCL) 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.864 OF 2016 ORDER:- 1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claiming the following direction: “to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the impugned action of the 4th respondent herein in issuing Lr.No.AE/0/Ymg/F.No./D.No.497/16 dated 2.01.2016 stating that necessary approvals may be furnished on or before 4.1.2016 otherwise the service will be disconnected without further notice is arbitrary illegal capricious high handed violative of Articles 14 19 1 g 21 and the guarantee under Article 300A of the Constitution of India apart from being in violation of the statutory provisions of the Electricity Act and the Rules made there under apart from being in violation of the principles of natural justice and fair play and consequently direct the 4th respondent herein to continue the power supply to the premises bearing Door Nos.2/143 and 144 of Uppar Street Yemmiganur Kurnool District without disconnecting the same in any manner whatsoever”. 2. Heard Sri B. Sita Rama Raju, learned counsel appeared on virtual mode on behalf of Sri T.S.Anand, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents has furnished written instructions dated 11.09.2026 issued by the Assistant Engineer Operation Section, APSPDCL, Yemmiganur, wherein it is stated that the claim of the petitioner for restoration of service connection has been complied with and that the service connection has since been restored and is presently in force. 4. Therefore, in view of the restoration of power supply to the petitioner, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. 4 5. Accordingly, writ petition is closed. No costs. 6. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date: 11.09.2026 BSM 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.864 OF 2016 Date: 11.09.2026 W BSM