Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9703 (CAL)

SAMAYUN SEKH @ SARJEN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/1044/2026 · 2026-04-17

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17/04/2026 D/L – 11 Court No.28 S. Kundu Rejected C.R.M.(A) 1044 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Farakka P.S case no. 310 of 2025 dated 10/08/2025 under sections 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act. In the matter of: Samayun Sekh @ Sarjen ...Petitioner. Mr. J.I. Hossain …for the petitioner. Ms. Sonali Das Md. Ezaj Akter …for the State. 1. Report filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that other than the statement of a co-accused, there is no other material available against the petitioner. Charge sheet has been submitted. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He submits that other than the statement of the co-accused, there is a criminal antecedent of the petitioner under the provisions of the NDPS Act. 4. Considering the above, the other incriminating materials available in the case diary and the restriction contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act, I do not consider this to be a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2 5. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Jay Sengupta, J.)