Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9702 (JHR)

JUMAN ANSARI ALIAS JUMAN MIYAN ALLIAS JUMNA ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1086/2026 · 2026-03-17

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7189 --1-- A.B.A. No. 1086 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1086 of 2026 ---- 1. Juman Ansari @ Juman Miyan @ Jumna Ansari, aged about 39 years, son of Maina Miyan @ Mena Miyan, resident of village – Samshihiriya, PO and PS – Domchanch, District – Koderma, Jharkhand 2. Md. Sadik Ansari, aged about 47 years, son of Rahim Ansari, resident of village – Samsihiriya, PO – Dhodhakola, PS – Domchanch, District – Koderma, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Siddhant Singh, Advocate :- Mr. Sahil, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Prabir Kr. Chatterjee, Advocate ---- 02/17.03.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1702 of 2021, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 42 of Indian Forest Act and Section 51(1) of Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case and false allegations are made of excavating mica scrap. He further submits 2026:JHHC:7189 --2-- A.B.A. No. 1086 of 2026 that the petitioners are earning their livelihood by way of doing labour work. He then submits that one of the co-accused person has already been granted anticipatory bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in ABA No.11482 of 2022 and two of the co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.60 of 2026. He then submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.10 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there against the petitioners of doing theft of mica scrap. 5. Considering that the petitioners are said to be labourer and they earn their livelihood by way of doing the said work and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.10 of the petition and three of the co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid ABAs and in that view of the matter the petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioners on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 17.03.2026 Sangam/