Michealraj v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police
CRL OP(MD)/23233/2025 · 2026-01-07
S Srimathy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 97018 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 97018 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP(MD)No.23233 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07.01.2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.23233 of 2025 Michealraj
... Petitioner
Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its the Inspector of Police, AWPS- Thallakulam, Madurai City, Madurai. (FIR in Crime No.16/2025) ... Respondent/Complainant
For Petitioner : Mr.P.M.Vishnuvarthanan
For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.16 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD)No.23233 of 2025 ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 69, 351(2) BNS 2023, in Crime No.16 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had sexual intercourse with the defacto complainant on false promise of marriage. Further on 14.09.2025, the petitioner tried to marry another girl. A case has been registered as against the petitioner. Hence, the apprehension of arrest.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence. He seeks this Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD)No.23233 of 2025
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the offences committed by the petitioner are serious in nature.
5. The present petition is the 2nd anticipatory bail application. The 1st anticipatory bail application was considered elaborately and the same was dismissed. Now considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also the fact that already earlier petition was filed by the petitioner and the same was dismissed by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.15790 of 2025, dated 10.11.2025 and there is no change of circumstances in this case. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the 2nd anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.
(S S Y J)
07.01.2026 ebsi 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD)No.23233 of 2025 TO
1. The Inspector of Police, AWPS- Thallakulam, Madurai City, Madurai.
2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD)No.23233 of 2025
S.SRIMATHY,J. ebsi CRL OP(MD)No.23233 of 2025 07.01.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis