Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9701 (JHR)

DEEPAK NARONE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/7356/2025 · 2026-05-04

Rajesh Shankar

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:13121-DB ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(PIL) No. 7356 of 2025 Deepak Narone, aged about 36 years, son of Sri Dilip Narone, resident of House No. 40, Ward No. 30, Baidyanath Lane (near Baba Mandir), P.O. & P.S.- Nagar Thana, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand. ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O.-Deoghar, P.S.-Nagar Thana, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand. 3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Deoghar, P.O.-Deoghar, P.S.-Nagar Thana, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand. 4. The Commissioner, Santhal Pargana, P.O. & P.S.-Dumka, District- Dumka, Jharkhand. 5. The Chief Secretary, Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 6. Ramesh Parihasth, S/o-Neelkanth Parihasth, R/o-Vilasi Para, Sikhni Road, P.O.-Deoghar, P.S.-Deoghar Nagar, District-Degohar, Jharkhand. … ... Respondents ------ CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ------ For the Petitioner : Mr Rajeev Kumar, Advocate Ms Niteshwari Kumari, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr Piyush Chitresh, AC to AG ----- 02 /Dated: 04.05.2026 1. Heard Mr Rajeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Piyush Chitresh, learned AC to A.G. for the respondent nos. 1 to 5. 2. For the order that we propose to presently make no notice to the 6th respondent is necessary, because the 6th respondent can be given full opportunity by the Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, i.e. the 2nd respondent herein. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that presently the petitioner will be satisfied if directions are issued to the 2nd respondent to dispose of petitioner's representation dated 23.05.2023 (Annexure-5 to this petition) in a time-bound manner. ( 2026:JHHC:13121-DB ) 2 4. Without going into the merits and demerits of the allegations and counter allegations, we direct the 2nd respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation in accordance with law and on its own merits as expeditiously as possible, and in any event, within two months from the service of notice upon the 6th respondent. The Deputy Commissioner must serve such notice upon the 6th respondent within 15 days from today. 5. The Deputy Commissioner must hear the petitioner and the 6th respondent, and pass and communicate a reasoned order on the same. If any of the parties are aggrieved by such decision, they shall have the liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law. 6. With the above directions and without going into the various allegations and counter allegations, we dispose of this petition. 7. Mr Piyush Chitresh is requested to immediately communicate an authenticated copy of this order to the 2nd respondent i.e. the Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar for necessary action. 8. All concerned must act on an authenticated copy of this order. (M.S. Sonak, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) May 04, 2026 Ranjeet / R.Kr. NAFR Uploaded on 05.05.2026