Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9701 (GAU)

SRI TANU KONWAR ALIAS TANURAM KONWAR v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/3669/2026 · 2026-07-16

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No. 1/2 GAHC010141672026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3669/2026 SRI TANU KONWAR ALIAS TANURAM KONWAR SON OF LATE SABHARAM KONWAR, RESIDENT OF STATION ROAD, WARD NO-13, P.O AND P.S.-SIBASAGAR, DIST-SIBASAGAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, RAIL BHAVAN, RAISINA ROAD, NEW DELHI. 2:THE NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER MALIGAON NF RAILWAY GUWAHATI ASSAM 3:THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER TINSUKIA DIVISION NF RAILWAY TINSUKIA ASSAM 4:THE ESTATE OFFICER NF RAILWAY TINSUKIA DIVISION TINSUKIA ASSAM 5:THE SENIOR SECTION ENGINEER (W) MARIANI NF RAILWAY MARIANI JORHAT Page No. 2/2 ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P J SAIKIA, B SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 17.07.2026 Mr. P.J. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted, on instruction, that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty to file afresh. Mr. K Gogoi, learned Central Government Counsel [CGC] for all the respondents is present and has submitted that he has no objection to the prayer made by Mr. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant