Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9701 (AP)

BETHINA RAJAGOPALAKRISHNA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/24954/2026 · 2026-09-02

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010456252026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 24954/2026 Between: 1. BETHINA RAJAGOPALAKRISHNA, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO. 2-75A, CHITTAPURU (KAMMATURU) VILLAGE, CHATRAI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT - 521213. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522503. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE OFFICE, ELURU - 534006. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER RDO, NUZVID DIVISION, NUZVID, ELURU DISTRICT - 521201. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, CHATRAI MANDAL, CHATRAI, ELURU DISTRICT - 521214. 5. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER VRO, TUMMUGUDEM VILLAGE, CHATRAI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT - 521213. 6. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR, CHATRAI MANDAL, CHATRAI, ELURU DISTRICT - 521214. 7. THE VILLAGE SURVEYOR, TUMMUGUDEM VILLAGE SECRETARIAT, CHATRAI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT - 521213. Page 2 of 5 8. UPPALAPATI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. LINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O CHITTAPURU (KAMMATURU) VILLAGE, CHATRAI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT - 521213. 9. CHALLAGULLA SUBBA RAO, S/O. SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O TUMMUGUDEM VILLAGE, CHATRAI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT - 521213 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent authorities in attempting to alter, reduce or otherwise change the revenue entries relating to the petitioner's lands admeasuring Ac.0.42 cents in R.S.No.422/2A and Ac.2.53 cents in R.S.No.422/1 situated at Tummugudem Village, Chatrai Mandal, Eluru District, on the basis of an endorsement dated 16-06-2026 issued by the 6th respondent, without conducting a proper survey, without considering the registered documents, Pattadar Passbook, Adangal, ROR, F.M.B. and earlier F-Line survey records, and without issuing any notice or affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, violative of the principles of natural justice and Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondent authorities not to alter, reduce or modify the existing revenue entries of the petitioner in respect of the aforesaid lands and further direct the competent survey authorities to conduct a fresh survey and demarcation of the subject lands with reference to the registered documents, F.M.B., Field Sketch, village revenue records and the existing Pattadar Passbook/Adangal/ROR, after issuing notice to the petitioner and all concerned boundary holders, IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent authorities not to alter, reduce, modify or otherwise disturb the existing revenue entries or extent standing in the name of the petitioner in respect of Ac.0.42 cents in R.S.No.422/2A and Ac.2.53 cents in R.S.No.422/1 of Tummugudem Village, Chatrai Mandal, Eluru District, by virtue of endorsement dated 16-06-2026 issued by the 6th respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SAI SURYA TEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: Heard Ms. Pooja, learned counsel representing Sri P.Sai Surya Teja, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents 1 to 7. The notice in respect of respondents 8 and 9 is dispensed with since no adverse order has been passed affecting their interest. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 4th respondent is attempting to alter the entries in the revenue records in respect of Ac.0.42 cents in R.S.No.422/2A and Ac.2.53 cents in R.S.No.422/1, Tummugudem Village, Chatrai Mandal, Eluru District, without following the procedure contemplated under the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbook Act, 1971, and the Rules made thereunder. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of an extent of Ac.0.42 cents in R.S.No.422/2A and Ac.2.53 cents in R.S.No.422/1, Tummugudem Village, Chatrai Mandal, Eluru District. The petitioner acquired Ac.2.53 cents in R.S.No.422/1 under two registered documents, vide Registered Sale Deed Document No.1501 of 2013 dated 30.03.2013 for an extent of Ac.1.26 cents and Registered Gift Deed Document No.863 of 2011 dated 01.03.2011 for an extent of Ac.1.27 cents. The petitioner made an F-Line Application seeking to measure the land and demarcate the boundaries. Pursuant to the said application, the endorsement dated 16.06.2026 (Ex.P3) was issued. Learned counsel would submit that no survey was conducted. Taking advantage of Ex.P3, the 4th respondent is attempting to change the entries in the revenue records. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that the 4th respondent is not attempting to change the entries unilaterally in respect of the aforementioned lands. The 4th respondent will adhere to the procedure contemplated under the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbook Act, 1971, and the Rules made thereunder. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, inviting a counter and keeping the writ petition may not serve any purpose, and hence, the writ petition is disposed of, at the stage of admission, with the consent of learned counsel appearing on either side, directing the 4th respondent to adhere to the procedure contemplated under the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbook Act, 1971, and the Rules made thereunder, if any application is made regarding the updation of the Record of Rights in respect of the aforementioned land. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 03.09.2026 SNI 150 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 24954 OF 2026 Date: 03.09.2026 SNI