HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38740 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct the array of the parties of the writ petition during the course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the state-respondents. 3. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondent no.2/Tehsildar, Tamkuhiraj, Kushinagar to decide the Case No.11936 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.T202505440311936) (Geeta Devi vs. Dilip and Kumar), within the stipulated period." 4. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforesaid proceeding under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending before respondent no.2 since 2025. He further placed copy of the order-sheet of the pending proceeding, in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding expeditiously. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid proceedings to its logical conclusion, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 3 months, from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before the authority concerned, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in accordance with law. September 24, 2026 C.Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Geeta Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad