Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 97 (JHR)

SAMEER RAJ CHOUDHARY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT. OF PERSONNEL, ADMIN. REFORMS AND RAJBHASHA

WPC/876/2026 · 2026-02-09

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3386 1 W.P.(C) No. 876 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 876 of 2026 Sameer Raj Choudhary, aged about 41 years, son of Shashi Bhushan Choudhary, resident of behind City Care Hospital Shivpuri Colony, Mohanpur, P.O. & P.S. Pachamba, District Giridih, Jharkhand. …....... Petitioner(s) Vrs. 1. The State of Jharkhand through Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Ranchi, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District-Ranchi. 2. Jharkhand State Election Commission through its Commissioner, having its office at Ratu Road, Opposite Bank of India Ratu Road Branch, Judge Colony, Indrapuri Colony, P.O. G.P.O. Ranchi, P.S. Sukhdeo Nagar, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Deputy Commissioner, Giridih, having its office at Giridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, District Giridih, Jharkhand. 4. Sub Divisional Officer, Giridih, having its office at Giridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, District Giridih, Jharkhand. 5. Circle Officer, Giridih Sadar, having its office at Sadar, Giridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, District Giridih, Jharkhand. .......... Respondent(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the Resp. No.2 : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate Mrs. Shilpi Sandil Gadodia, Advocate Ms. Shruti Shekhar, Advocate Ms. Nidhi Lall, Advocate For the Resp.- State : Mr. Gaurav Raj, A.C to AAG-II For the Intervenor : Mr. Prashant Kr. Rai, Advocate 02/09.02.2026 It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner at present there is no cause of action existing and as such, he seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition to file a fresh one if any cause of action arises in future. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents are present and have no objection to the prayer. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. So far as I.A. No. 1854 of 2026 seeking intervention in the present writ petition is concerned, no relief can be granted for making intervention. 2026:JHHC:3386 2 W.P.(C) No. 876 of 2026 5. Accordingly, I.A. No. 1854 of 2026 is disposed of by giving liberty to the intervenor to file a writ petition, if so advised. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 09.02.2026 A. Mohanty Uploaded ____/____/2026