Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 97 (CHH)

DR. AMRITLAL ROHLEDAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/220/2026 · 2026-03-02

Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:11077 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 220 of 2026 1 - Dr. Amritlal Rohledar S/o Late Balveer @ Karl Rohledar Aged About 61 Years R/o Kutela Chowk, Kutela, Saraipali, Dist- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralay, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Civil And Revenue District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Public Instruction Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, Civil And Revenue District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee Through The Commissioner S.T. And S.C. Development Department, Atal Nagar, Civil And Revenue District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Laxman Kumar Nagwanshi S/o Late Shri Kashi Ram Nagwanshi Aged About 44 Years Caste- Munda, R/o Ward No. 15 Saraipali, Dist- Mahasamund (C.G.) (Applicant/ Intervenor) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Shri Akash Pandey, Advocate. For Respondents No.1to 3/State : Ms. K. Radhika, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No.4 : Shri Anmol Verma, Advocate. SB: Hon'ble Shri Justic e Sanjay S. Agrawal Order on Board 03/03/2026 1. Heard on admission. 2. This petition has been filed for the restoration of WPC No.900/2020, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 17/02/2026. NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Date: 2026.03.03 17:50:44 +0530 2 3. On due consideration and for the reason assigned in the petition, which is duly supported by an affidavit, I am inclined to allow the same. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and WPC No.900/2020 is directed to be restored to its original number. No order as to cost. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE Kamde