Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9699 (AP)

G BHASKAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/25536/2026 · 2026-09-07

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010458502026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 25536/2026 Between: 1. G BHASKAR, S/O LATE BATTEIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURAL COOLI, R/O D.NO.3-6, HARIJANAWADA, MERLAPAKA, SRIKALAHASTRI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517619. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522238. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517503. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SRIKALAHASTRI REVENUE DIVISION, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517644. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517619. 5. SRI VENKATESWARA SPONGE AND POWER PVT LTD, REP. BY ITS CEO, M. ANANDA RAO, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE (EXPANSION), SRIKALAHASTRI, MERLAPAKA VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517619 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondent No.2 in not taking the relevant facts and circumstances into consideration while passing the order vide proceedings D.Dis.D2/e-39755/2025, dated 15.02.2026, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside the order passed by Respondent No.2 vide proceedings D.Dis.D2/e-39755/2025, dated 15.02.2026, and further direct Respondent Nos.2 to 4 to mutate the land to an extent of Ac.1.00 cents in Sy.No.310-4G of Merlapaka Village Accounts, Yerpedu Mandal, Tirupati District, in the name of the Petitioner in the revenue records, and pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased set aside the orders vide proceedings D.Dis D2/e-39755/2025 dt: 15-02-2026 passed by the respondent no.2 by challenging the said order, pending disposal of Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAYALCHERUVU ABISHEK REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is Dismissed as Withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD